Balance between somatostatin and D2 receptor expression drives TSH-secreting adenoma response to somatostatin analogues and dopastatins

Riferimento: 
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012 Mar;76(3):407-14.
Autori: 
Gatto F, Barbieri F, Gatti M, Wurth R, Schulz S, Ravetti JL, Zona G, Culler MD, Saveanu A, Giusti M, Minuto F, Hofland LJ, Ferone D, Florio T.
Fonte: 
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012 Mar;76(3):407-14.
Anno: 
2012
Azione: 
La terapia di prima linea per adenomi ipofisari secernenti-tireotropina (TSHomas) è neurochirurgica, mentre il trattamento medico si basa principalmente su analoghi della somatostatina, octreotide e lanreotide.
Target: 
Octreotide-lanreotide/adenomi ipofisari.

ABSTRACT
CONTEXT:
First-line therapy for thyrotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas (TSHomas) is neurosurgery, while medical treatment rests mainly on somatostatin analogues. Clinically available sst(2) -preferring analogues, octreotide and lanreotide, induce normalization of hormone levels in approximately 90% of patients and tumour shrinkage in 45%.
OBJECTIVE:
We evaluated somatostatin 1, 2, 3 and 5 and dopamine D2 receptor expression in tumour samples from three TSHomas, and the relationships between receptor expression, in vitro antiproliferative response and clinical data, including octreotide test and three months of therapy with octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR). TSHoma cell proliferation was tested in vitro using octreotide, cabergoline and two chimeric compounds, BIM-23A
760 and BIM-23A387.
RESULTS:
All patients showed significant TSH lowering to acute octreotide test, but a hormonal response to long-term treatment was observed in only two patients, showing a high sst(5) /sst(2) ratio. Patient 2, characterized by high expression of sst(2) and sst(1) and a relative lower expression of sst(5) , experienced tachyphylaxis after prolonged octreotide treatment. In vitro, the somatostatin/dopamine receptor agonist BIM-23A760 caused the highest antiproliferative effect among those tested. Combined treatment with octreotide and cabergoline displayed an additive effect of magnitude comparable to that of the other chimeric compound (BIM-23A387). Octreotide resistance was confirmed in cells isolated from the nonresponder patient, although it could be overcome by treatment with the chimeric compounds.
CONCLUSIONS:
A high sst(5) /sst(2) ratio might be predictive of a positive outcome to long-term treatment with somatostatin analogues in TSHomas. Moreover, combined somatostatin and D(2) receptor targeting might be considered as a potential tool to improve the response rate in octreotide-resistant tumours.